Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:29

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Dementia: Switching to MIND diet even later in life can lower risk - Medical News Today
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are the popular niches to talk about as a content creator on the social media platform?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Taking a realistic look at terraforming Mars - Phys.org
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Dinosaurs Had More Than Just Teeth—They Had Cancer, and It’s Changing Everything - The Daily Galaxy
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
With a marketing degree, can I do a master’s in film production?